The Manager's Path

A Guide for Tech Leaders Navigating Growth and Change

Paperback, 244 páginas

Idioma English

Publicado el 26 de Agosto de 2017 por O'Reilly Media.

ISBN:
978-1-4919-7389-9
¡ISBN copiado!

Ver en OpenLibrary

4 estrellas (2 reseñas)

Managing people is difficult wherever you work. But in the tech industry, where management is also a technical discipline, the learning curve can be brutal—especially when there are few tools, texts, and frameworks to help you. In this practical guide, author Camille Fournier (tech lead turned CTO) takes you through each stage in the journey from engineer to technical manager.

From mentoring interns to working with senior staff, you’ll get actionable advice for approaching various obstacles in your path. This book is ideal whether you’re a new manager, a mentor, or a more experienced leader looking for fresh advice. Pick up this book and learn how to become a better manager and leader in your organization.

  • Begin by exploring what you expect from a manager
  • Understand what it takes to be a good mentor, and a good tech lead
  • Learn how to manage individual members while remaining focused on the …

1 edición

reseñó The Manager's Path de Camille Fournier

A pratical Guide for Tech Leaders

5 estrellas

The book is divided into chapters for different management roles. Every chapter describes in a practical and pragmatic way the challenges that come with a role. Unfortunately some generic information about assessment, conflict handling, and culture is hidden in mutliple chapters. Therefore is it not enough to read a few chapters for your actual situation to get the whole picture. You have to get through every chapter to extract important information that is applicable to all management roles.

Review of "The Manager's Path" on 'Goodreads'

3 estrellas

I liked it (that's what the 3 stars rating means :-p ).

Some very good insights, advice and hints.

Also, many things missing from my point of view (missing much more XP), and some "wrong" approaches (I would say "too American/competitive/individualistic" approach sometimes, and other times too "mainstream", like assuming traditional estimations, too much focus on the 1on1s versus open team retrospectives, etc.).

It would have been nice to use a gender-neutral "they" in a consistent way, instead of jumping from "he" to "she" continuously, sometimes it was confusing to me.